Mears v Centrepoint [1996] UKEAT 820_95_0910 (9 October 1996)

Mears v Centrepoint [1996] UKEAT 820_95_0910 (9 October 1996)

The Tribunal's finding that Mr Mears was aware of the facts founding his complaint before the expiration of the statutory period was not an error of law. The appeal disclosed no arguable ground for error of law and must be dismissed.

Citation
[1996] UKEAT 820_95_0910
Parties
Appellant: Mr Mears; Respondent: Centrepoint
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 October 1996
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Time Limits, Disciplinary Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Mears

Appellant

Centrepoint

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law by refusing to extend time for a racial discrimination complaint
  2. 2 Whether Mr Mears was aware of the facts founding his complaint within the statutory time limit

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's finding that Mr Mears was aware of the facts founding his complaint before the expiration of the statutory period was not an error of law. The appeal disclosed no arguable ground for error of law and must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed