Meme v Lloyds Bank Plc [1996] UKEAT 600_95_2702 (27 February 1996)
Personal difficulties, while sympathetic, do not excuse failure to comply with the prescribed time-limits for appeal. No notice of appeal in proper form was received, and the appellant failed to attend or be represented. The Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1996] UKEAT 600_95_2702
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Meme; Respondent: Lloyds Bank Plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Against Registrar's Order (employment Appeal Tribunal) / Appeal Hearing on Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs against the appellant.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Unfair Dismissal, Race Discrimination, Costs
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Meme
Appellant
Lloyds Bank Plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Against Registrar's Order (employment Appeal Tribunal) / Appeal Hearing on Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant provided sufficient explanation to justify extension of time for appeal
- 2 Whether the Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct
- 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Personal difficulties, while sympathetic, do not excuse failure to comply with the prescribed time-limits for appeal. No notice of appeal in proper form was received, and the appellant failed to attend or be represented. The Registrar's refusal to extend time was correct.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs against the appellant.
Orders
- Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
- Appellant to pay the costs of Lloyds Bank Plc, to be assessed by the Taxing Officer.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment