Davis v ITNET [2003] UKEAT 0514_02_2103 (21 March 2003)
The Employment Tribunal's findings did not justify a conclusion that redundancy was inevitable regardless of proper consultation and retraining; therefore, the decision to award no compensation was unsustainable and must be reconsidered on a percentage basis.
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 0514_02_2103
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Michael Davis; Respondent: ITNET
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Full Hearing on Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part, Tribunal's decision on compensation set aside, case remitted for reconsideration of remedy.
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Compensation, Re Engagement, Reinstatement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Michael Davis
Appellant
ITNET
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Full Hearing on Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in finding redundancy dismissal was inevitable and awarding no compensation
- 2 Whether the Tribunal applied the correct date for practicability of reinstatement
- 3 Whether the Tribunal erred in refusing re-engagement based on salary differential
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal's findings did not justify a conclusion that redundancy was inevitable regardless of proper consultation and retraining; therefore, the decision to award no compensation was unsustainable and must be reconsidered on a percentage basis.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part, Tribunal's decision on compensation set aside, case remitted for reconsideration of remedy.
Orders
- Set aside Tribunal's decision awarding no compensation.
- Remit case to Employment Tribunal for reconsideration of compensation and possible re-engagement.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment