ASHRANA LIMITED v Mr Mike Crystall (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19754 (22 February 2018)

ASHRANA LIMITED v Mr Mike Crystall (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19754 (22 February 2018)

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. No response was filed by the respondent. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Citation
[2018] DRS 19754
Parties
Complainant: ASHRANA LIMITED; Respondent: Mr Mike Crystall
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
22 February 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trade Mark Rights
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Transfer Trade Mark Rights

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ASHRANA LIMITED

Complainant

Mr Mike Crystall

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name should be transferred to the complainant
  2. 2 Whether the respondent's registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. No response was filed by the respondent. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to ASHRANA LIMITED.