Miss R MacDougald-Denton v Mr Mohammad Ali & Others (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : National Minimum Wage : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations : Written Pay Statement : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 3401124/2016 (16 October 2017)

Miss R MacDougald-Denton v Mr Mohammad Ali & Others (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : National Minimum Wage : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Working Time Regulations : Written Pay Statement : Written Statements) [2017] UKET 3401124/2016 (16 October 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid the national minimum wage, suffered unlawful deductions from wages, was unfairly dismissed, and was subjected to sex discrimination. The respondents failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding written pay statements and working time regulations.

Citation
[2017] UKET 3401124/2016
Parties
Claimant: Miss R MacDougald-Denton; Respondent: Mr Mohammad Ali & Others
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claims upheld
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, National Minimum Wage, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Working Time Regulations, Written Pay Statement, Written Statements
Employment Law Breach of Contract National Minimum Wage Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Unlawful Deduction From Wages Working Time Regulations Written Pay Statement +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss R MacDougald-Denton

Claimant

Mr Mohammad Ali & Others

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was paid the national minimum wage
  2. 2 Whether there was sex discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was not paid the national minimum wage, suffered unlawful deductions from wages, was unfairly dismissed, and was subjected to sex discrimination. The respondents failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding written pay statements and working time regulations.

Court Disposition

Claims upheld

Orders

  • Respondents to pay compensation to claimant
  • Respondents to provide written pay statements and written statements