Innox Trading v Mr Mohammad Saeed Akhtar (Full Decision _No Action) [2018] DRS 19389 (05 March 2018)
The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2018] DRS 19389
- Parties
- Complainant: Innox Trading; Respondent: Mr Mohammad Saeed Akhtar
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 05 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Complaint denied
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Innox Trading
Complainant
Mr Mohammad Saeed Akhtar
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
Ratio Decidendi
The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint denied
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment