Nagarajan v North London Railways & Ors [1997] UKEAT 1431_96_1104 (11 April 1997)

Nagarajan v North London Railways & Ors [1997] UKEAT 1431_96_1104 (11 April 1997)

There are two arguable points of law: failure to address the protected act/victimisation complaint and failure to consider means before awarding costs, warranting a full hearing on these issues.

Citation
[1997] UKEAT 1431_96_1104
Parties
Appellant: Mr Nagarajan
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 April 1997
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Matter to proceed to full hearing limited to two specified points of law.
Legal Topics
Victimisation, Protected Act, Costs Order
Employment Law Victimisation Protected Act Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Nagarajan

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal failed to address the complaint of victimisation due to raising a grievance (protected act)
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal properly considered Mr Nagarajan's means before making an order for costs

Ratio Decidendi

There are two arguable points of law: failure to address the protected act/victimisation complaint and failure to consider means before awarding costs, warranting a full hearing on these issues.

Court Disposition

Matter to proceed to full hearing limited to two specified points of law.

Orders

  • Full hearing ordered on the issues of victimisation (protected act) and consideration of means before awarding costs