Nayak v. Lucent Advisors (UK) Ltd & Anor (Jurisdictional Points - Worker, employee or neither) [2017] UKEAT 0154_17_0412 (4 December 2017)
The Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to determining employment status by failing to focus on the contractual right of control, giving undue weight to the absence of control over 'how' duties were performed, and treating the self-employed label as determinative. The preliminary issue of employment status must be reconsidered.
- Citation
- [2017] UKEAT 0154_17_0412
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Nayak; First Respondent: Lucent Advisors (UK) Limited; Second Respondent: Lucent Lincolnshire Lakes SARL
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Preliminary issue set aside and remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Employment Status, Unfair Dismissal, Continuity of Employment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nayak
Appellant
Lucent Advisors (UK) Limited
First Respondent
Lucent Lincolnshire Lakes SARL
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Nayak was an employee, worker, or self-employed contractor
- 2 Whether Mr Nayak had two years' continuous employment
Ratio Decidendi
The Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to determining employment status by failing to focus on the contractual right of control, giving undue weight to the absence of control over 'how' duties were performed, and treating the self-employed label as determinative. The preliminary issue of employment status must be reconsidered.
Court Disposition
Preliminary issue set aside and remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- Remission to Employment Judge Johnson to reconsider employment status in light of this Judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment