Green v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 396 (TC) (28 April 2014)
The Tribunal determined that the market value of the gifted Chartersea shares on 4 April 2008 was not the £1 per share claimed by Mr Green, nor the 30p per share asserted by HMRC, but a value to be determined based on the evidence, including the price paid for the company’s main asset, the circumstances of the listing, and the nature of the trades on the first day. The Tribunal found that the market value should reflect a realistic assessment of what a willing purchaser would pay, taking into account all relevant facts, and ordered the disallowance of relief to be re-determined accordingly.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 396
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Nicholas Green; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Gift Aid Relief, Valuation of Shares, Charitable Gifts, Market Value Determination
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nicholas Green
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 What was the market value of the gifted Chartersea Limited shares on 4 April 2008 for the purpose of income tax relief under section 431 ITA 2007?
- 2 Was the arrangement designed to enhance relief or create artificial tax losses?
- 3 What is the relevance of market transactions on the first day of listing to the valuation?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that the market value of the gifted Chartersea shares on 4 April 2008 was not the £1 per share claimed by Mr Green, nor the 30p per share asserted by HMRC, but a value to be determined based on the evidence, including the price paid for the company’s main asset, the circumstances of the listing, and the nature of the trades on the first day. The Tribunal found that the market value should reflect a realistic assessment of what a willing purchaser would pay, taking into account all relevant facts, and ordered the disallowance of relief to be re-determined accordingly.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- The disallowance of relief on Mr Green’s claim is to be re-determined in accordance with the Tribunal’s findings on market value.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment