MR NICOLAS BURLEY v Revenue & Customs (INCOME TAX - PENALTIES - Whether HMRC had adduced adequate evidence as to system and its production and posting of penalty notices) [2023] UKFTT 59 (TC) (17 January 2023)
HMRC adduced sufficiently detailed and cogent documentary evidence of system, production, and posting of penalty notices; presumption of service under Interpretation Act 1978 section 7 applies; appellant failed to rebut presumption; penalties validly notified.
- Citation
- [2023] UKFTT 59
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Nicolas Burley; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Penalty Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed except for daily penalties not pursued by HMRC; penalties upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Penalties, Notification of Penalty Assessments, Burden of Proof, Interpretation Act 1978 Section 7, Self Assessment Regime
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Nicolas Burley
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Penalty Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC adduced adequate evidence as to system and its production and posting of penalty notices
- 2 Whether appellant rebutted the presumption of service under Interpretation Act 1978 section 7
Ratio Decidendi
HMRC adduced sufficiently detailed and cogent documentary evidence of system, production, and posting of penalty notices; presumption of service under Interpretation Act 1978 section 7 applies; appellant failed to rebut presumption; penalties validly notified.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed except for daily penalties not pursued by HMRC; penalties upheld.
Orders
- Appeal allowed by consent for daily penalties imposed on 11 August 2017; all other penalties upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment