William S Graham Ltd (t/a W S Graham & Sons & The Calls Grill) v. O'Donnell [2000] UKEAT 545_00_1910 (19 October 2000)
The Respondent failed to discharge the burden of proving a good reason for not entering an appearance, as evidence indicated knowledge of the proceedings. The Chairman was entitled to proceed in the absence of the parties, and no sufficient defence on the merits was established. The appeal is dismissed.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 545_00_1910
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr O'Donnell; Respondent/appellant: William S Graham Ltd trading as W S Graham & Sons & The Calls Grill
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Notice of Appearance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr O'Donnell
Applicant
William S Graham Ltd trading as W S Graham & Sons & The Calls Grill
Respondent/appellant
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing on Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondent had good grounds for not entering an appearance
- 2 Whether there was a fairly arguable defence on the merits
- 3 Whether the Chairman was entitled to proceed in the absence of the Applicant and Respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The Respondent failed to discharge the burden of proving a good reason for not entering an appearance, as evidence indicated knowledge of the proceedings. The Chairman was entitled to proceed in the absence of the parties, and no sufficient defence on the merits was established. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; original Employment Tribunal decision stands
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment