Onyango v Berkeley (t/a Berkeley Solicitors) (Victimisation Discrimination : Protected disclosure) [2013] UKEAT 0407_12_2501 (25 January 2013)
As a matter of statutory construction, post-termination disclosures may be relied on if they lead to detrimental treatment; the Employment Tribunal was wrong to decline jurisdiction to consider the section 47B complaint.
- Citation
- [2013] UKEAT 0407_12_2501
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Onyango; Respondent: Unknown (Respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 25 January 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Protected Disclosure, Whistleblowing, Victimisation Discrimination, Post Termination Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Onyango
Appellant
Unknown (Respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Employment Tribunal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a claimant may rely on a post-termination protected disclosure in a whistleblowing claim under section 47B Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
As a matter of statutory construction, post-termination disclosures may be relied on if they lead to detrimental treatment; the Employment Tribunal was wrong to decline jurisdiction to consider the section 47B complaint.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Case remitted to a different Employment Tribunal for determination of the section 47B complaint on its merits
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment