Mr S Fry v Mr P Bourdillon (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2017] UKET 1600419/2016 (15 February 2017)

Mr S Fry v Mr P Bourdillon (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2017] UKET 1600419/2016 (15 February 2017)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection or remedies under the legislation.

Citation
[2017] UKET 1600419/2016
Parties
Claimant: Mr S Fry; Respondent: Mr P Bourdillon
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
15 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing
Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr S Fry

Claimant

Mr P Bourdillon

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant made a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998
  2. 2 Whether the claimant suffered detriment as a result of making a protected disclosure

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not entitled to protection or remedies under the legislation.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed