Parkins v. Sodexho Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1239_00_1701 (17 January 2001)
The Tribunal found that the application for interim relief did not meet the statutory requirements, but the Appeal Tribunal held that it is arguable whether breach of contract can amount to a breach of legal obligation under Section 43B(1)(b), and whether the costs order was properly made under the relevant rules.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1239_00_1701
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Parkins; Respondent: Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted on grounds 1-6; leave refused on ground 7.
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Protected Disclosure, Health and Safety, Costs Orders, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Parkins
Appellant
Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in law in refusing interim relief under Section 129 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 2 Whether a breach of contract can constitute a 'failure to comply with any legal obligation' under Section 43B(1)(b) of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- 3 Whether the costs order was justified under the applicable rules
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the application for interim relief did not meet the statutory requirements, but the Appeal Tribunal held that it is arguable whether breach of contract can amount to a breach of legal obligation under Section 43B(1)(b), and whether the costs order was properly made under the relevant rules.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted on grounds 1-6; leave refused on ground 7.
Orders
- Leave to appeal granted on grounds 1-6
- Chairman's Notes of evidence to be provided
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment