MOULIN ROUGE v Mr Paul Helyer (Full Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20211 (13 July 2018)

MOULIN ROUGE v Mr Paul Helyer (Full Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20211 (13 July 2018)

The panel found that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive as it took unfair advantage of the complainant's trademark rights.

Citation
[2018] DRS 20211
Parties
Complainant: MOULIN ROUGE; Respondent: Mr Paul Helyer
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
13 July 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

MOULIN ROUGE

Complainant

Mr Paul Helyer

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the registration of the domain name constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive as it took unfair advantage of the complainant's trademark rights.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.