Hawkins v Ball & Anor [1995] UKEAT 1289_95_1512 (15 December 1995)
The Tribunal did not err in law by considering the obtaining of incorrect legal advice as a relevant factor in extending time under section 76(5) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975; the Tribunal's decision was within its broad discretion and was not perverse.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 1289_95_1512
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Peter Hawkins; 1st Respondent: Miss Michelle Ball; 2nd Respondent: Barclays Bank Plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 15 December 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sex Discrimination, Victimisation, Time Limits, Extension of Time, Industrial Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Peter Hawkins
Appellant
Miss Michelle Ball
1st Respondent
Barclays Bank Plc
2nd Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Preliminary Decision on Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in extending time for presenting a sex discrimination complaint under section 76(5) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975
- 2 Whether obtaining incorrect legal advice is a relevant consideration for extending time under the 'just and equitable' test
- 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was perverse
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal did not err in law by considering the obtaining of incorrect legal advice as a relevant factor in extending time under section 76(5) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1975; the Tribunal's decision was within its broad discretion and was not perverse.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Application for Chairman's notes of evidence dismissed
- Leave to amend notice of appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment