Pitman v David Hill & Co [1992] UKEAT 518_91_1003 (10 March 1992)

Pitman v David Hill & Co [1992] UKEAT 518_91_1003 (10 March 1992)

There was no error of law by the Industrial Tribunal; the facts did not support a finding of constructive dismissal, and the Tribunal was entitled to disregard post-resignation correspondence as irrelevant.

Citation
[1992] UKEAT 518_91_1003
Parties
Appellant: Mr Pitman; Respondent: Mr Hill
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 March 1992
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Unfair Dismissal, Review of Tribunal Decision
Employment Law Constructive Dismissal Unfair Dismissal Review of Tribunal Decision

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Pitman

Appellant

Mr Hill

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in dismissing the claim for constructive dismissal
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal failed to consider relevant evidence submitted before the hearing

Ratio Decidendi

There was no error of law by the Industrial Tribunal; the facts did not support a finding of constructive dismissal, and the Tribunal was entitled to disregard post-resignation correspondence as irrelevant.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed at preliminary hearing