Plettell v. British Aerospace (Operations) Ltd [2000] UKEAT 446_00_1907 (19 July 2000)
There is an arguable point of law due to the tribunal's failure to make a clear finding on the involvement of Mr Dumbleton, who was aware of the appellant's race, in the shortlisting process, and possible inconsistencies in the tribunal's reasoning.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 446_00_1907
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Plettell; Respondent: Unknown Respondent (Employer)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Employment Tribunal Procedure, Shortlisting Process, Review Refusal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Plettell
Appellant
Unknown Respondent (Employer)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing – Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in its approach to evidence regarding knowledge of the appellant's race by those involved in the shortlisting process
- 2 Whether the tribunal failed to make a clear finding on the involvement of Mr Dumbleton in the selection process
- 3 Whether there was inconsistency in the tribunal's findings regarding the appellant's suitability and the reasons for not shortlisting him
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable point of law due to the tribunal's failure to make a clear finding on the involvement of Mr Dumbleton, who was aware of the appellant's race, in the shortlisting process, and possible inconsistencies in the tribunal's reasoning.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed to proceed to full hearing
Orders
- Appeal against substantive decision and refusal of review to proceed to full hearing
- Production of Chairman's Notes of the whole hearing required
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment