Quinlan v B & Q Plc [1998] UKEAT 1386_97_2701 (27 January 1998)
The applicant was not a person with a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 because he was able to lift everyday objects and did not meet the statutory requirements for deemed disability; the Industrial Tribunal's findings of fact and application of statutory guidance were correct.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 1386_97_2701
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Quinlan; Respondent: B & Q Plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 27 January 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Definition of Disability, Disability Discrimination Act 1995, Jurisdiction of Industrial Tribunal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Quinlan
Appellant
B & Q Plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is a person with a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the applicant's physical impairment has a substantial and long-term adverse effect on his ability to carry out normal day-to-day activities
- 3 Whether registration as disabled confers deemed disability under the Act
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant was not a person with a disability under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 because he was able to lift everyday objects and did not meet the statutory requirements for deemed disability; the Industrial Tribunal's findings of fact and application of statutory guidance were correct.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- Application for leave to proceed to full hearing dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment