Miss E Bridgeman v Mr R Frost (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2023] UKET 3204231/2022 (20 March 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent's actions were because of her age. There was insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 3204231/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: Miss E Bridgeman; Respondent: Mr R Frost
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miss E Bridgeman
Claimant
Mr R Frost
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant failed to prove, on the balance of probabilities, that the respondent's actions were because of her age. There was insufficient evidence to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment