Ramanlal v. Sheth & Anor [2001] UKEAT 0556_01_2109 (21 September 2001)

Ramanlal v. Sheth & Anor [2001] UKEAT 0556_01_2109 (21 September 2001)

The only arguable ground of appeal is the procedural issue regarding the first Respondent's entitlement to participate under Rule 3; all other grounds lack substance and are dismissed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 0556_01_2109
Parties
Appellant: Mr Ramanlal; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 September 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed except for procedural issue regarding first Respondent's participation, which is to proceed to inter partes hearing.
Legal Topics
Itemised Payslips, Unlawful Deductions From Wages, Unfair Dismissal, Procedural Rules, Delay in Promulgation
Employment Law Itemised Payslips Unlawful Deductions From Wages Unfair Dismissal Procedural Rules Delay in Promulgation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Ramanlal

Appellant

First Respondent

Respondent

Second Respondent

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether first Respondent was entitled to participate in proceedings without entering appearance under Rule 3 of the Employment Tribunals Rules 1993
  2. 2 Whether adequate reasons were given for the Tribunal's decision
  3. 3 Whether refusal to grant witness orders was procedurally unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The only arguable ground of appeal is the procedural issue regarding the first Respondent's entitlement to participate under Rule 3; all other grounds lack substance and are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed except for procedural issue regarding first Respondent's participation, which is to proceed to inter partes hearing.

Orders

  • Appeal against second Respondent dismissed.
  • Appeal against first Respondent dismissed except for procedural issue under Rule 3, to be heard in Category B before a Resident judge with a two-hour time limit.