Sidgwick v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 421 (TC) (08 September 2010)
The 13 amp heat storage Aga, although providing incidental heat, is designed primarily for cooking and not for heating space. Therefore, it does not qualify as a 'building material' under Schedule 8 Group 5 Note 22, and is excluded from VAT refund entitlement.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 421
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Richard Sidgwick; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- VAT Refund, DIY Builder Scheme, Building Materials, Interpretation of Schedule 8 Group 5 Note 22
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Richard Sidgwick
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (VAT)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a 13 amp heat storage Aga qualifies as a 'building material' under Schedule 8 Group 5 Note 22 for VAT refund purposes
- 2 Whether the Aga is an 'electrical appliance designed to heat space'
Ratio Decidendi
The 13 amp heat storage Aga, although providing incidental heat, is designed primarily for cooking and not for heating space. Therefore, it does not qualify as a 'building material' under Schedule 8 Group 5 Note 22, and is excluded from VAT refund entitlement.
Court Disposition
Appeal refused
Orders
- No VAT refund to appellant
- No expenses due to or by either party
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment