Rowe v Girovend Cashless Systems Plc & Anor [1998] UKEAT 278_98_1011 (10 November 1998)
The Applicant was not assigned to the part of the undertaking transferred to the Second Respondent; the Employment Tribunal's factual findings and application of the law were correct and unassailable.
- Citation
- [1998] UKEAT 278_98_1011
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Rowe; First Respondent: Debitek Holdings Limited (formerly GiroVend Holdings Limited); Second Respondent: GiroVend Cashless Systems Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, Assignment of Employment, Employment Rights Act 1996, Regulation 5 TUPE
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Rowe
Applicant
Debitek Holdings Limited (formerly GiroVend Holdings Limited)
First Respondent
GiroVend Cashless Systems Ltd
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Applicant was employed in the part of the undertaking transferred to the Second Respondent within the meaning of Regulation 5 of the Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment Regulations 1981
Ratio Decidendi
The Applicant was not assigned to the part of the undertaking transferred to the Second Respondent; the Employment Tribunal's factual findings and application of the law were correct and unassailable.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment