Rowe v. Moss Plastic Parts Ltd [2000] UKEAT 420_00_1207 (12 July 2000)

Rowe v. Moss Plastic Parts Ltd [2000] UKEAT 420_00_1207 (12 July 2000)

The Employment Tribunal properly confined the claim to contractual pay difference, found no breach of implied mutual trust and confidence, and determined no legal grounds for harassment or victimisation; thus, the appeal disclosed no arguable point of law.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 420_00_1207
Parties
Appellant: Mr Rowe; Respondent: Respondent Company
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 July 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Equal Pay, Harassment, Contractual Terms, Victimisation
Employment Law Equal Pay Harassment Contractual Terms Victimisation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Rowe

Appellant

Respondent Company

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether denial of pay increase constituted harassment or breach of contract
  2. 2 whether there was a breach of implied term of mutual trust and confidence
  3. 3 whether there was victimisation under Employment Rights Act 1996

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal properly confined the claim to contractual pay difference, found no breach of implied mutual trust and confidence, and determined no legal grounds for harassment or victimisation; thus, the appeal disclosed no arguable point of law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed; no further action