Russell v. Bacon's College & Anor [2000] EAT 98_99_2803 (28 March 2000)
The employer breached the Regulations by failing to inform the appellant or invite election of employee representatives; the Regulations require informing employees directly if no representatives exist.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2000] EAT 98_99_2803
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Russell; Respondent: First Respondent (transferor); Respondent: Second Respondent (transferee)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Undertakings, Employee Information Rights, Implementation of EU Directives
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Russell
Appellant
First Respondent (transferor)
Respondent
Second Respondent (transferee)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the employer breached the duty to inform under the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 1981 when no employee representative was appointed
- 2 Whether there is a lacuna in the Regulations regarding informing employees directly
Ratio Decidendi
The employer breached the Regulations by failing to inform the appellant or invite election of employee representatives; the Regulations require informing employees directly if no representatives exist.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- First Respondent to pay £277 compensation to the appellant
- Appeal withdrawn against Second Respondent
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment