Scott & Ors v. Yorkshire Miners Welfare Convalescent Homes [2000] UKEAT 673_00_2410 (24 October 2000)
There is an arguable case that the tribunal erred in law or reached a perverse decision by apparently ignoring evidence and failing to make findings about it; therefore, the matter should proceed to a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 673_00_2410
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Scott; Appellant: Mr and Mrs Aldridge; Respondent: First Respondent; Respondent: Second Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Case remitted for full hearing
- Legal Topics
- Continuity of Employment, Transfer of Undertakings, Redundancy, Fair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Scott
Appellant
Mr and Mrs Aldridge
Appellant
First Respondent
Respondent
Second Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was a transfer of undertaking from the first respondent to the second respondent
- 2 Whether the tribunal erred in law by failing to make essential findings of fact
- 3 Whether the dismissals were fair and constituted redundancy
Ratio Decidendi
There is an arguable case that the tribunal erred in law or reached a perverse decision by apparently ignoring evidence and failing to make findings about it; therefore, the matter should proceed to a full hearing.
Court Disposition
Case remitted for full hearing
Orders
- The matter is to proceed to a full hearing.
- The full hearing should have the benefit of the Chairman's Notes of Evidence of Mr Scott, Mr and Mrs Aldridge, and Mr Hardman.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment