JAKKS Pacific, Inc. v Mr Seb Clark Trifega Ltd (Full Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17732 (19 October 2016)
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or similar to the complainant's mark, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
- Citation
- [2016] DRS 17732
- Parties
- Complainant: JAKKS Pacific, Inc.; Respondent: Mr Seb Clark; Respondent: Trifega Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
Complainant
Mr Seb Clark
Respondent
Trifega Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
- 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the domain name was identical or similar to the complainant's mark, that the respondent had no rights or legitimate interests, and that the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment