Smith v London Borough Of Lambeth & Ors [1997] UKEAT 1009_96_3101 (31 January 1997)
The Tribunal's refusal to adjourn and dismissal of the complaint was a proper exercise of discretion, not amounting to an error of law or perversity, and thus not open to appellate interference.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 1009_96_3101
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Smith; Respondent: Unknown Respondents
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 January 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure, Adjournment Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr Smith
Appellant
Unknown Respondents
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law by refusing to grant an adjournment and dismissing the complaint in the appellant's absence.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal's refusal to adjourn and dismissal of the complaint was a proper exercise of discretion, not amounting to an error of law or perversity, and thus not open to appellate interference.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; no amendment to Notice of Appeal permitted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment