Cherian v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX/CORPORATION TAX : Other) [2016] UKFTT 316 (TC) (09 May 2016)
The tribunal found that HMRC had reasonable grounds for not issuing a closure notice, as the enquiry was at a preliminary stage and the appellant had not provided all requested information, particularly bank statements necessary to verify his income and benefits. The information notice was valid and the information requested was reasonably required. The penalties were properly imposed as the appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for non-compliance. There was no evidence of improper motive or abuse of power by HMRC, and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to consider such arguments.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 316 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Sony Cherian; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 May 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax/corporation Tax Other / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision on Closure Notice Application, Information Notice Appeal, and Penalty Appeals
- Outcome
- Application for closure notice refused; information notice varied; penalty appeals dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax Enquiry, Closure Notice, Information Notice, Penalties for Non Compliance, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Reasonable Excuse, Abuse of Power
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Sony Cherian
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax/corporation Tax Other / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision on Closure Notice Application, Information Notice Appeal, and Penalty Appeals
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be directed to issue a closure notice for the 2012/13 tax enquiry under s 28A TMA
- 2 Whether the information notice issued under Schedule 36 Finance Act 2008 was valid and reasonable
- 3 Whether penalties for non-compliance with the information notice were properly imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that HMRC had reasonable grounds for not issuing a closure notice, as the enquiry was at a preliminary stage and the appellant had not provided all requested information, particularly bank statements necessary to verify his income and benefits. The information notice was valid and the information requested was reasonably required. The penalties were properly imposed as the appellant did not have a reasonable excuse for non-compliance. There was no evidence of improper motive or abuse of power by HMRC, and the tribunal lacked jurisdiction to consider such arguments.
Court Disposition
Application for closure notice refused; information notice varied; penalty appeals dismissed.
Orders
- HMRC not directed to issue a closure notice; enquiry may continue.
- Information notice varied to permit redaction of personal information from bank statements as per para 19(3) Schedule 36.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment