Sumsion v. BBC (Scotland) [2007] UKEAT 0042_06_2103 (21 March 2007)
The employer was entitled under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to require the claimant to take annual leave on specified Saturdays, as the contract required availability for work on those days. There is no restriction in the regulations or the parent directive preventing leave being given or taken in single days or on any particular day of the week, including Saturdays. The arrangement did not constitute a sham and fulfilled the statutory requirements.
- Citation
- [2007] UKEAT 0042_06_2103
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Sumsion; Respondent: BBC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 March 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Working Time Regulations, Annual Leave, Employment Contracts, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Sumsion
Appellant
BBC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether an employer can require an employee to take annual leave on days when the employee would not otherwise be required to work, specifically Saturdays, under the Working Time Regulations 1998.
Ratio Decidendi
The employer was entitled under the Working Time Regulations 1998 to require the claimant to take annual leave on specified Saturdays, as the contract required availability for work on those days. There is no restriction in the regulations or the parent directive preventing leave being given or taken in single days or on any particular day of the week, including Saturdays. The arrangement did not constitute a sham and fulfilled the statutory requirements.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment