Sunderalingam v. Anchor Trust [2001] UKEAT 869_00_2102 (21 February 2001)

Sunderalingam v. Anchor Trust [2001] UKEAT 869_00_2102 (21 February 2001)

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to establish any error of law or procedural unfairness by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal's management of witnesses and evidence did not amount to bias or procedural impropriety, and the appellant did not demonstrate that any detriment suffered was causally linked to a protected act under the Race Relations Act 1976.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 869_00_2102
Parties
Appellant: Mr Sunderalingam; Respondent: Anchor Trust
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Employment Tribunal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Sunderalingam

Appellant

Anchor Trust

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law or procedure in dismissing the appellant's claims of race discrimination and victimisation
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal's conduct of proceedings, including witness evidence and procedural fairness, amounted to bias or procedural impropriety

Ratio Decidendi

The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to establish any error of law or procedural unfairness by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal's management of witnesses and evidence did not amount to bias or procedural impropriety, and the appellant did not demonstrate that any detriment suffered was causally linked to a protected act under the Race Relations Act 1976.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed