Sunderalingam v. Anchor Trust [2001] UKEAT 869_00_2102 (21 February 2001)
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to establish any error of law or procedural unfairness by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal's management of witnesses and evidence did not amount to bias or procedural impropriety, and the appellant did not demonstrate that any detriment suffered was causally linked to a protected act under the Race Relations Act 1976.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 869_00_2102
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Sunderalingam; Respondent: Anchor Trust
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Race Discrimination, Victimisation, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Sunderalingam
Appellant
Anchor Trust
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law or procedure in dismissing the appellant's claims of race discrimination and victimisation
- 2 Whether the Tribunal's conduct of proceedings, including witness evidence and procedural fairness, amounted to bias or procedural impropriety
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the appellant failed to establish any error of law or procedural unfairness by the Employment Tribunal. The Tribunal's management of witnesses and evidence did not amount to bias or procedural impropriety, and the appellant did not demonstrate that any detriment suffered was causally linked to a protected act under the Race Relations Act 1976.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment