Brown v. Avonline Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1047_00_0802 (8 February 2001)

Brown v. Avonline Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1047_00_0802 (8 February 2001)

The Tribunal's decision was not vitiated in law by failing to explicitly address every argument; it provided a reasoned explanation for preferring Mr West's evidence over the appellant's, and there was no compelling error of law.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1047_00_0802
Parties
Appellant: Mr T Brown; Respondents: Avonline and Cable Corporation
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
08 February 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Termination of Contract, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Employment Law Discrimination Law Racial Discrimination Termination of Contract Employment Tribunal Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr T Brown

Appellant

Avonline and Cable Corporation

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

  1. 1 Whether the termination of the appellant's contract was on racial grounds and constituted unlawful discrimination contrary to section 4 of the Race Relations Act 1976
  2. 2 Whether the Employment Tribunal failed to address key arguments raised by the appellant regarding the reason for termination

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decision was not vitiated in law by failing to explicitly address every argument; it provided a reasoned explanation for preferring Mr West's evidence over the appellant's, and there was no compelling error of law.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • appeal dismissed; no further proceedings permitted