Thorne & Anor v. Riverside Centre Ltd [2000] UKEAT 1017_99_0903 (9 March 2000)
The proposition that failure to entertain submissions on remedy is arguable; thus, the appeal will proceed to a full hearing.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 1017_99_0903
- Parties
- Applicant: Mr Thorne; Applicant: Miss Rolfe; Respondent: Riverside Centre Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- case proceeds to full appeal hearing
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Remedies, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Mr Thorne
Applicant
Miss Rolfe
Applicant
Riverside Centre Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 whether the Employment Tribunal erred by not entertaining submissions on remedy
- 2 whether the finding of suitable alternative employment for Miss Rolfe was perverse
Ratio Decidendi
The proposition that failure to entertain submissions on remedy is arguable; thus, the appeal will proceed to a full hearing.
Court Disposition
case proceeds to full appeal hearing
Orders
- appeal to be listed for 2 hours, category C
- exchange of skeleton arguments not less than 14 days before hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment