O2 Holdings Limited v Mr Tim Brazier (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12906 (10 July 2013)

O2 Holdings Limited v Mr Tim Brazier (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2013] DRS 12906 (10 July 2013)

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. No response was filed by the respondent. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Citation
[2013] DRS 12906
Parties
Complainant: O2 Holdings Limited; Respondent: Mr Tim Brazier
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 July 2013
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Law Internet Law Domain Name Disputes Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

O2 Holdings Limited

Complainant

Mr Tim Brazier

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registered by the respondent is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the registration was abusive

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name or mark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive. No response was filed by the respondent. The domain name should be transferred to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.