Jain v Toshiba International (Europe) Ltd [1993] UKEAT 659_92_2604 (26 April 1993)

Jain v Toshiba International (Europe) Ltd [1993] UKEAT 659_92_2604 (26 April 1993)

The Tribunal's decisions on costs, discrimination, victimisation, constructive dismissal, and bias were within its discretion and not perverse or erroneous in law; therefore, there was no basis for appellate interference.

Citation
[1993] UKEAT 659_92_2604
Parties
Appellant: Mr V Jain; Respondent: Unknown Respondent (Employer)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 April 1993
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Constructive Dismissal, Costs, Bias
Employment Law Discrimination Law Racial Discrimination Victimisation Constructive Dismissal Costs Bias

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr V Jain

Appellant

Unknown Respondent (Employer)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Industrial Tribunal erred in law in dismissing complaints of racial discrimination and victimisation
  2. 2 Whether the order for costs against the applicant was proper
  3. 3 Whether there was constructive dismissal

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal's decisions on costs, discrimination, victimisation, constructive dismissal, and bias were within its discretion and not perverse or erroneous in law; therefore, there was no basis for appellate interference.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No interference with the Tribunal's decision
  • Applicant to pay Respondent £4,000 in costs