Bruce v. Northampton Borough Council [2000] UKEAT 751_99_2007 (20 July 2000)
Rule 12(4) does not empower the tribunal to make an order disallowing allowances against a party who did not apply for adjournment; such orders must be made under Rule 12(1) if the preconditions are met.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 751_99_2007
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr V M S Bruce; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 20 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal Hearing
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Tribunal Procedure, Allowances, Adjournment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 1
Parties
Mr V M S Bruce
Appellant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Rule 12(4) empowers a tribunal to disallow allowances in advance for a party who did not apply for adjournment
- 2 Interpretation of Rule 12(4) and its scope regarding allowances
Ratio Decidendi
Rule 12(4) does not empower the tribunal to make an order disallowing allowances against a party who did not apply for adjournment; such orders must be made under Rule 12(1) if the preconditions are met.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- order of disallowing allowances quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment