Richard-Noel v. Crane Hill Engineering [2000] UKEAT 581_99_1204 (12 April 2000)

Richard-Noel v. Crane Hill Engineering [2000] UKEAT 581_99_1204 (12 April 2000)

No good reason was shown for extension of time for appeal; appellant failed to attend or advance arguments; procedural requirements not met.

Citation
[2000] UKEAT 581_99_1204
Parties
Appellant: Mr W Richard-Noel; Respondent: Crane Hill Engineering
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
12 April 2000
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Lodging Notice of Appeal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Extension of Time, Procedural Appeals, Racial Harassment, Victimisation
Employment Law Extension of Time Procedural Appeals Racial Harassment Victimisation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr W Richard-Noel

Appellant

Crane Hill Engineering

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal Against Refusal to Extend Time for Lodging Notice of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether extension of time should be granted for lodging Notice of Appeal
  2. 2 Whether procedural decisions can be appealed out of time
  3. 3 Whether appellant's explanation justifies extension

Ratio Decidendi

No good reason was shown for extension of time for appeal; appellant failed to attend or advance arguments; procedural requirements not met.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • No extension of time granted for lodging Notice of Appeal
  • All applications to the Employment Appeal Tribunal are out of time and disallowed