Whiley v. Christopher Clarke Workshops Ltd [2003] UKEAT 1403_01_1103 (11 March 2003)
The Tribunal erred in law by treating the employer's lack of knowledge of the applicant's disability as determinative for justification under section 5(1)(b) DDA and by failing to properly consider whether the employer could reasonably have known of the disability and substantial disadvantage under section 6(6).
- Citation
- [2003] UKEAT 1403_01_1103
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Whiley; Respondent: Christopher Clark Workshops Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Disability Discrimination, Reasonable Adjustments, Justification Defence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Whiley
Appellant
Christopher Clark Workshops Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal constituted disability discrimination under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 2 Whether the employer failed to make reasonable adjustments under section 6 DDA
- 3 Whether the employer's lack of knowledge of disability justified dismissal under section 5(1)(b) DDA
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by treating the employer's lack of knowledge of the applicant's disability as determinative for justification under section 5(1)(b) DDA and by failing to properly consider whether the employer could reasonably have known of the disability and substantial disadvantage under section 6(6).
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- DDA claim remitted to a fresh Tribunal for rehearing on justification under section 5(1)(b) and possible breach of section 5(2)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment