White v Worcester Royal Infirmary [1995] UKEAT 716_94_0803 (8 March 1995)
The appeal cannot be determined without the Chairman's notes on key evidence regarding direct management encouragement and procedural fairness; central issues must be addressed in Tribunal reasons.
- Citation
- [1995] UKEAT 716_94_0803
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr White; Respondents: Ronkswood Hospital (Management)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 March 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Interlocutory (directions for Further Evidence Before Substantive Appeal Hearing)
- Outcome
- Adjourned for further evidence
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Tribunal Procedure, Misconduct, Review of Tribunal Decision
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr White
Appellant
Ronkswood Hospital (Management)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Interlocutory (directions for Further Evidence Before Substantive Appeal Hearing)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal erred in failing to address the allegation of direct management encouragement of the misconduct
- 2 Whether the Tribunal erred in not addressing contradictory evidence regarding management's knowledge of the practice
- 3 Whether procedural fairness was compromised by continuing the hearing in the absence of parties' representatives
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal cannot be determined without the Chairman's notes on key evidence regarding direct management encouragement and procedural fairness; central issues must be addressed in Tribunal reasons.
Court Disposition
Adjourned for further evidence
Orders
- Chairman to provide notes of evidence on specific points identified in the judgment
- Parties to attempt to agree and provide any notes or documents relevant to the disputed issues before the next hearing
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment