White v. Entech Technical Solutions Ltd [2000] UKEAT 1175_99_1201 (12 January 2000)
The appeal should proceed to a full hearing on the issue of whether the tribunal erred in law in drawing inferences about the period of notice, but not on the ground that the tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence over the appellant's on factual disputes.
- Citation
- [2000] UKEAT 1175_99_1201
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr White; Respondent: Unknown Respondent
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 12 January 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
- Outcome
- Partial allowance of appeal; set down for full hearing on identified issue; other grounds dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Notice Period, Contractual Inference, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr White
Appellant
Unknown Respondent
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Preliminary Hearing Ex Parte
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal erred in drawing inferences about the period of notice in the appellant's contract
- 2 Whether the tribunal erred in law in evaluating the evidence regarding the nature and period of employment
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal should proceed to a full hearing on the issue of whether the tribunal erred in law in drawing inferences about the period of notice, but not on the ground that the tribunal preferred the respondent's evidence over the appellant's on factual disputes.
Court Disposition
Partial allowance of appeal; set down for full hearing on identified issue; other grounds dismissed.
Orders
- Chairman's Notes of Evidence to be produced and added to the appeal file.
- Appeal set down for hearing in Category C with a two-hour estimate.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment