W J Tatem v Mr William James (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 23023 (10 November 2020)

W J Tatem v Mr William James (Summary Decision _No Action) [2020] DRS 23023 (10 November 2020)

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith.

Citation
[2020] DRS 23023
Parties
Complainant: W J Tatem; Respondent: Mr William James
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
10 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Disputes
Intellectual Property Domain Name Disputes

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

W J Tatem

Complainant

Mr William James

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent is abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration was abusive or in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action