Williams v London Borough Of Southwark [1997] UKEAT 471_97_3110 (31 October 1997)
The appeals were dismissed because the tribunals were entitled to find no less favourable treatment or action short of dismissal, and the costs order was within the tribunal's discretion given the appellant's unreasonable conduct.
- Citation
- [1997] UKEAT 471_97_3110
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Williams; Appellant's Trade Union: Public Transport Staff Consortium; Respondent: London (South) Council
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 31 October 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Trade Union Rights, Internal Disciplinary Procedures, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Williams
Appellant
Public Transport Staff Consortium
Appellant's Trade Union
London (South) Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was subjected to unlawful racial discrimination or victimisation under the Race Relations Act 1976
- 2 Whether the respondent's refusal to allow representation by an unrecognised trade union constituted action short of dismissal contrary to Section 146(1)(c) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- 3 Whether the Industrial Tribunal's order for costs was justified
Ratio Decidendi
The appeals were dismissed because the tribunals were entitled to find no less favourable treatment or action short of dismissal, and the costs order was within the tribunal's discretion given the appellant's unreasonable conduct.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- First appeal dismissed: no arguable point of law on discrimination or victimisation
- Second appeal dismissed: no action short of dismissal established
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment