Williams v. Owens Corning Fibreglass (Gb) Ltd [2001] UKEAT 1039_00_1312 (13 December 2001)
The tribunal erred in law by failing to properly address whether the discriminatory scoring system was causative of the applicant's dismissal and by misdirecting itself on the effect of the applicant volunteering for redundancy. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 1039_00_1312
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Williams; Respondent: Respondent Company
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing before a different tribunal.
- Legal Topics
- Disability Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Redundancy Procedures, Reasonable Adjustments
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Williams
Appellant
Respondent Company
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent's redundancy scoring system discriminated against the applicant due to disability
- 2 Whether the applicant's dismissal was less favourable treatment related to his disability under Section 5(1) of the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
- 3 Whether the dismissal was unfair due to the discriminatory scoring system
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal erred in law by failing to properly address whether the discriminatory scoring system was causative of the applicant's dismissal and by misdirecting itself on the effect of the applicant volunteering for redundancy. The appeal is allowed and the matter is remitted for rehearing.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing before a different tribunal.
Orders
- The appeal is allowed.
- The cross-appeal is allowed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment