Willoughby v Morland (Holdings) Ltd [1991] UKEAT 316_91_2810 (28 October 1991)

The Registrar did not err in refusing an extension of time as the Tribunal's decision was clear, and there was no sufficient ambiguity or justification for the delay in filing the appeal.

Citation: [1991] UKEAT 316_91_2810
Parties: Appellant: Mr Willoughby; Respondent: Morland (Commercial Developments) Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 28 October 1991
Procedural Posture: Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal
Outcome: Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics: Written Statement of Employment Terms, Reasonable Notice, Extension of Time to Appeal

Employment Law Written Statement of Employment Terms Reasonable Notice Extension of Time to Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2

Parties

Mr Willoughby

Appellant

Morland (Commercial Developments) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Application for Extension of Time to Appeal

Legal Issues

1 Whether the Registrar erred in refusing an extension of time to appeal
2 Whether the Industrial Tribunal's decision was ambiguous regarding reasonable notice

Ratio Decidendi

The Registrar did not err in refusing an extension of time as the Tribunal's decision was clear, and there was no sufficient ambiguity or justification for the delay in filing the appeal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

Appeal dismissed
No extension of time granted