Wilson v. Jeld-Wen (UK) Litd [2001] UKEAT 1232_00_2603 (26 March 2001)

Wilson v. Jeld-Wen (UK) Litd [2001] UKEAT 1232_00_2603 (26 March 2001)

The Tribunal did not err in law; there was no evidence of differential treatment on racial grounds regarding the removal or restoration of the plus rate, nor was the issue of expression of sympathy raised before the Tribunal. The appeal disclosed no arguable error of law.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1232_00_2603
Parties
Appellant: Mr Wilson; Respondent: Employer (unnamed)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Unlawful Deduction of Pay, Unfair Dismissal, Constructive Dismissal
Employment Law Discrimination Law Racial Discrimination Victimisation Unlawful Deduction of Pay Unfair Dismissal Constructive Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr Wilson

Appellant

Employer (unnamed)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in law in dismissing claims of racial discrimination, victimisation, unlawful deduction of pay, and unfair dismissal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not err in law; there was no evidence of differential treatment on racial grounds regarding the removal or restoration of the plus rate, nor was the issue of expression of sympathy raised before the Tribunal. The appeal disclosed no arguable error of law.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed