Witter v Securicor Ltd [1993] UKEAT 109_91_1305 (13 May 1993)
The Tribunal was entitled to find no racial discrimination as the facts did not compel such an inference; the report's reference to race was not improper and the procedures followed were neutral. The Tribunal was also entitled to find that the employment ended by termination rather than true resignation, entitling the appellant to written reasons under Section 53.
- Citation
- [1993] UKEAT 109_91_1305
- Parties
- Appellant: Mr Witter; Respondent: Securicor Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 1993
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
- Outcome
- Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Dismissal, Written Reasons for Dismissal, Employment Termination Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr Witter
Appellant
Securicor Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Industrial Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was subjected to racial discrimination by the employer
- 2 Whether the appellant was entitled to written reasons for dismissal under Section 53 of the Employment Protection (Consolidation) Act 1978
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal was entitled to find no racial discrimination as the facts did not compel such an inference; the report's reference to race was not improper and the procedures followed were neutral. The Tribunal was also entitled to find that the employment ended by termination rather than true resignation, entitling the appellant to written reasons under Section 53.
Court Disposition
Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal by Mr Witter is dismissed.
- The cross-appeal by Securicor Limited is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment