MacPherson v. Dean [2001] UKEAT 1321_00_0405 (4 May 2001)

MacPherson v. Dean [2001] UKEAT 1321_00_0405 (4 May 2001)

No arguable error of law was found in the Employment Tribunal's remedies decision; the grounds raised by the appellant did not meet the strict criteria for admitting new evidence post-judgment, nor did they disclose any legal error regarding the award or its terms.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 1321_00_0405
Parties
Applicant: Mrs April Dean; Respondent: Mr Robert MacPherson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
04 May 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Pregnancy Discrimination, Equal Pay, Remedies, Appeal Procedure
Employment Law Discrimination Law Constructive Dismissal Sex Discrimination Unfair Dismissal Pregnancy Discrimination Equal Pay Remedies +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs April Dean

Applicant

Mr Robert MacPherson

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Preliminary Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal erred in awarding remedies for unfair dismissal and sex discrimination
  2. 2 Whether new evidence regarding the applicant's employment post-dismissal should be admitted
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's conduct post-judgment affects the remedy

Ratio Decidendi

No arguable error of law was found in the Employment Tribunal's remedies decision; the grounds raised by the appellant did not meet the strict criteria for admitting new evidence post-judgment, nor did they disclose any legal error regarding the award or its terms.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.