Archibald & Co Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 21 (TC) (11 January 2010)
The Tribunal held that Mrs Archibald's selection of the 'accountancy or book-keeping' sector was not inappropriate given her background and the ordinary meaning of the terms. HMRC's refusal to backdate the change of sector was reasonable and consistent with policy, as there was no error or unreasonableness in the original selection.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 21 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs Archibald; Respondent: HMRC
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 11 January 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Tribunal Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT Flat Rate Scheme, Trade Sector Classification, Backdating of Category Changes, Reasonableness of HMRC Decisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Archibald
Appellant
HMRC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
VAT Tribunal Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mrs Archibald's selection of 'accountancy or book-keeping' as trade sector was a mistake
- 2 Whether HMRC's refusal to backdate the change of trade sector was reasonable
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that Mrs Archibald's selection of the 'accountancy or book-keeping' sector was not inappropriate given her background and the ordinary meaning of the terms. HMRC's refusal to backdate the change of sector was reasonable and consistent with policy, as there was no error or unreasonableness in the original selection.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment