Cooper v. Dr P Kakad & Dr L Dickinson (In Partnership) [2001] UKEAT 252_00_2103 (21 March 2001)

Cooper v. Dr P Kakad & Dr L Dickinson (In Partnership) [2001] UKEAT 252_00_2103 (21 March 2001)

The Employment Tribunal found no contractual entitlement to additional sick pay or occupation of the flat, and no fundamental breach of contract by the Respondents. The conduct complained of did not amount to constructive dismissal.

Citation
[2001] UKEAT 252_00_2103
Parties
Appellant: Mrs Cooper; Respondents: Dr Kakad and Dr Dickinson
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 March 2001
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Breach of Contract, Sick Pay, Occupational Benefits, Itemised Pay Statements, Unlawful Deductions
Employment Law Constructive Dismissal Breach of Contract Sick Pay Occupational Benefits Itemised Pay Statements Unlawful Deductions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mrs Cooper

Appellant

Dr Kakad and Dr Dickinson

Respondents

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the appellant was constructively dismissed
  2. 2 Whether occupation of the flat was a contractual benefit
  3. 3 Whether the appellant was entitled to additional sick pay

Ratio Decidendi

The Employment Tribunal found no contractual entitlement to additional sick pay or occupation of the flat, and no fundamental breach of contract by the Respondents. The conduct complained of did not amount to constructive dismissal.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed