Fearn v. Home Office [2001] UKEAT 0686_01_2306 (23 June 2001)
The Tribunal erred in law by refusing leave to amend the IT1 solely on the basis that it widened the issues and by refusing leave to serve the race discrimination questionnaire out of time based only on passage of time, contrary to the procedural order and without proper consideration of relevant factors.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0686_01_2306
- Parties
- Appellant: Mrs D Fearn; Respondent: The Home Office
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Racial Discrimination, Victimisation, Unlawful Deduction of Wages, Amendment of Pleadings, Procedural Directions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs D Fearn
Appellant
The Home Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Interlocutory Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether leave should be granted to amend the IT1
- 2 Whether leave should be granted to serve a race discrimination questionnaire out of time
- 3 Whether unlawful deduction of wages can exist as a free-standing cause of action
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal erred in law by refusing leave to amend the IT1 solely on the basis that it widened the issues and by refusing leave to serve the race discrimination questionnaire out of time based only on passage of time, contrary to the procedural order and without proper consideration of relevant factors.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Set aside Tribunal's refusal to allow amended IT1; amendment allowed and to be served forthwith, except paragraph 21 (unlawful deduction of wages) to be remitted to substantive hearing for preliminary determination.
- Set aside Tribunal's refusal to permit race discrimination questionnaire; leave granted for questionnaire to be served with all reasonable speed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment